Moral Injury: When the Trauma Comes From Beliefs and Values

Introduction

Moral injury, a concept often closely related to but distinct from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), has gained increasing attention in mental health and trauma studies. Unlike PTSD, which is often triggered by life-threatening events, moral injury arises from perceived moral transgressions that violate an individual’s deeply held beliefs or values (Litz et al., 2009). Such transgressions can lead to a profound sense of guilt, shame, and betrayal, often resulting in significant emotional and cognitive distress (Shay, 2014). Social cognitive models, which emphasize the interplay between cognition, social environment, and emotional regulation, provide valuable insights into the experience of moral injury and its treatment. This article explores moral injury through a social cognitive framework, examining how factors such as trust, social support, and cognitive appraisal influence the onset and healing process of moral injury.

Defining Moral Injury and Social Cognitive Models

Moral injury differs from traditional PTSD in its roots. Rather than a fear-based response to trauma, moral injury stems from a sense of violation of personal moral codes, leading to feelings of guilt, shame, and a disrupted sense of self (Litz et al., 2009). This distinction aligns with social cognitive models, which focus on how individuals process traumatic experiences in light of their social environments and belief systems. Developed from Bandura’s (1986) foundational social cognitive theory, these models view trauma as not only a psychological response but one shaped by social contexts, cognitive appraisals, and individual beliefs.

Applying social cognitive principles to moral injury allows for an understanding of the relational and cognitive aspects of moral transgressions. In the case of moral injury, beliefs about oneself, others, and the world are often significantly disrupted, challenging the individual’s sense of morality and integrity. As such, moral injury can be viewed through a social cognitive lens as a conflict between personal values and traumatic experiences that alters one’s core beliefs about oneself and one’s place within the social world.

Key Social Cognitive Components of Moral Injury

1. Cognitive Appraisals and Moral Transgressions

Cognitive appraisal, the process by which an individual interprets and evaluates an event, plays a central role in social cognitive models of moral injury. For those experiencing moral injury, the appraisal often involves a perception of personal culpability or violation of moral codes (Litz et al., 2009). Such appraisals are closely linked to feelings of shame and guilt, as individuals may hold themselves responsible for actions that conflict with their moral beliefs (Drescher et al., 2011).

For example, military personnel who have engaged in or witnessed acts that contradict their moral values may interpret these experiences as personal failings. These appraisals can reinforce a negative self-image and a diminished sense of worth, exacerbating emotional suffering. Social cognitive models emphasize the role of cognitive restructuring, which involves challenging and reframing these negative self-appraisals to facilitate a healthier interpretation of one’s actions and reduce guilt and shame (Resick et al., 2008).

2. Social Support and the Rebuilding of Trust

Social support is a crucial factor in the recovery from moral injury. Social cognitive models assert that social connections play an essential role in trauma recovery, as individuals rely on others for validation, understanding, and emotional support (Bandura, 1986). For individuals with moral injury, this need for social support is often complicated by feelings of betrayal and mistrust, particularly if they feel alienated or judged by those around them (Shay, 2014).

Social support is not only beneficial for reducing isolation but also serves as a critical mechanism for re-establishing trust. When moral injury undermines an individual’s trust in humanity or specific institutions, such as the military or religious organizations, having a supportive network can foster a sense of belonging and validation. These interactions allow for the gradual rebuilding of trust, enabling individuals to reconcile their experiences with their moral beliefs.

3. Trust, Betrayal, and the Impact of Institutional Authority

Moral injury is often associated with a profound sense of betrayal, especially when individuals perceive that authority figures or institutions have failed to uphold their ethical standards (Shay, 2014). Social cognitive models emphasize the importance of trust and moral integrity, viewing betrayal as a catalyst for emotional and cognitive dissonance. When trust is broken, individuals may experience a disruption in their beliefs about authority, justice, and morality.

Re-establishing trust is a central goal in treating moral injury, often beginning with therapeutic environments that are consistent, empathetic, and non-judgmental. Building trust within therapy can lay the foundation for individuals to explore their feelings of betrayal safely and, over time, to restore their faith in social and institutional systems.

4. Self-Perception, Identity, and Moral Injury

Moral injury can profoundly affect self-perception, leading to a fragmented or damaged self-concept. Individuals may view themselves as morally flawed or irredeemable, which can contribute to feelings of hopelessness and worthlessness (Drescher et al., 2011). Social cognitive models address this by encouraging individuals to re-evaluate their self-perceptions and to understand that moral injury does not define their entire identity.

Cognitive restructuring within a therapeutic setting can help individuals reframe their beliefs about themselves. By promoting a more balanced view that considers both their moral values and their actions within the context of their experiences, therapy can aid in the process of reconstructing identity and reducing self-condemnation.

5. Narrative Formation and Meaning-Making

Constructing a coherent narrative around morally injurious events is essential for processing and integrating these experiences into one’s life story (Litz et al., 2009). Social cognitive models emphasize the importance of narrative formation as a therapeutic tool, helping individuals make sense of their experiences, challenge irrational beliefs, and find a sense of resolution. Meaning-making allows individuals to reframe their experiences within a broader moral context, ultimately fostering personal growth.

Therapies that incorporate narrative formation, such as cognitive processing therapy (CPT), encourage individuals to explore and reconstruct their trauma narratives in a way that reduces emotional distress and fosters resilience. By engaging in this process, individuals with moral injury can work toward a sense of moral reconciliation, allowing them to reconcile their past actions with their current values and beliefs.

The Influence of Cultural and Societal Contexts

Moral injury is not only shaped by individual experiences but is also influenced by cultural and societal beliefs. Social cognitive models recognize that cultural norms and societal expectations play a significant role in shaping how individuals interpret and respond to moral transgressions. In cultures that value honor, duty, and self-sacrifice, individuals who feel they have violated these values may experience heightened shame and guilt, complicating the healing process (Litz et al., 2009).

Societal attitudes towards mental health and morality also influence the experience of moral injury. Individuals who face stigma related to their experiences may feel reluctant to seek help, fearing judgment or ostracism. Social cognitive models advocate for culturally sensitive approaches that respect these norms while providing supportive environments that encourage open dialogue and understanding.

Implications for Treatment: A Social Cognitive Approach to Moral Injury

Social cognitive models of moral injury emphasize a comprehensive approach to treatment that addresses cognitive, emotional, and social dimensions. Effective treatment strategies should integrate social support, cognitive restructuring, and narrative formation to foster healing. The following are key principles derived from social cognitive models that can guide trauma-informed care for moral injury:

1. Creating Safe and Trustworthy Therapeutic Environments

Establishing a safe and trustworthy therapeutic environment is essential for individuals with moral injury. Therapy should focus on rebuilding trust and providing a non-judgmental space for individuals to explore their experiences without fear of condemnation. This foundation enables survivors to re-establish connections with others, facilitating a gradual return to social life.

2. Promoting Narrative Formation and Meaning-Making

Helping individuals construct coherent trauma narratives can be particularly effective for those experiencing moral injury. Narrative therapy encourages survivors to reframe their experiences within a broader moral framework, reducing distress and promoting resilience.

3. Supporting Cognitive Restructuring and Re-Evaluation of Self-Perceptions

Social cognitive approaches to moral injury emphasize the importance of cognitive restructuring, particularly in re-evaluating negative self-appraisals. Techniques that challenge irrational beliefs and replace them with balanced, realistic perspectives can help individuals overcome feelings of shame and self-condemnation.

4. Encouraging Social Support and Connection

Integrating social support into treatment is essential for moral injury recovery. Group therapies, peer support, and community involvement can reduce isolation and offer validation, allowing individuals to feel understood and supported in their healing journey.

Conclusion

Moral injury, while distinct from traditional PTSD, shares many elements with it, particularly in its social and cognitive dimensions. Through the lens of social cognitive models, moral injury is understood as a profound conflict between personal values and traumatic experiences, shaped by cognitive appraisals, social context, and cultural beliefs. Addressing moral injury requires a holistic approach that prioritizes trust, narrative formation, and cognitive restructuring. By focusing on these elements, mental health professionals can better support individuals in reconciling their experiences and restoring their sense of moral integrity and personal worth.

References

Certainly. Here is the complete APA7-style reference list:

References

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.

Drescher, K. D., Foy, D. W., Kelly, C., Leshner, A., Schutz, K., & Litz, B. (2011). An exploration of the viability and usefulness of the construct of moral injury in war veterans. Traumatology, 17(1), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534765610395615

Litz, B. T., Stein, N., Delaney, E., Lebowitz, L., Nash, W. P., Silva, C., & Maguen, S. (2009). Moral injury and moral repair in war veterans: A preliminary model and intervention strategy. Clinical Psychology Review, 29(8), 695–706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2009.07.003

Resick, P. A., Monson, C. M., & Chard, K. M. (2008). Cognitive processing therapy: Veteran/military version. Department of Veterans Affairs.

Shay, J. (2014). Moral injury. Psyche and Spirit: Journal of Religion, Psychology, and Social Work, 1(1), 1-8.